Lucia Rojas murdered her infant in cold blood after picking him up from Jacobi Medical Center, where he'd been getting treated after being born prematurely. She confessed to smothering him on a city bus and then dumping the body in a trash can.

15 years for Lucia Rojas, who killed, dumped baby
http://www.nydailynews.com/ny_local/bronx/2009/01/29/2009-01-29_15_years_for_lucia_rojas_who_killed_dump.html

Personally I think 15 years is too lenient. She should be put to death by a firing squad if you ask me. Right along side Casey Anthony.

And still - still - there are these pro-feminazi people who are coming to her defense using this post-partum insanity horseshit. I'm really sick of that.

Remember that former Women's Magazine editor who dressed up as a fireman on Halloween so he gain access into that women's apartment and rape her? Well, he was insane, too. So why not allow him to go free?

Matter of fact - let's take Timothy McVeigh. I mean, you have to be insane to blow up a building, right? He should have just been sent to a mental ward for a few years until some quack with a piece of paper from some university declared him fit for society again.

Heck, everyone who commits a crime is insane to some degree, so let's just abolish prisons all together and build more mental hospitals!

Billy Kess
http://billykess.com/

You mean to tell me that after 8 years of Bush bashing on a relentless and hateful level, that the Democraps are now passing around a petition against Rush Limbaugh just for saying that he hopes Obama's policies fail?

 

Democrats Launch Petition Against Rush Limbaugh

 

Are you KIDDING me? You cry babies.

 

The shoe is on the other foot now. And you're acting just as I predicted. Like little babies who can dish it out, but can't take it. Oh, that medicine sure tastes horrible when it's your own, doesn't it, little Democraps?

 

And just who the hell do you think you are to even imply that your screwball baby butchering messiah is above critique, huh? He's not. He's just a man. A man who got elected by flaming socialists and people from Harlem who didn't even know where the hell he stood on any of the issues, but came out to vote for him because he was half black.

 

http://howobamagotelected.com/

 

Check that site out if you think I'm just rambling on.

 

LOL if you're this upset over what Rush said already. You got a looooong, hard road ahead of you. Because trust me - this is just the beginning.

 

Remember when you proudly stated how it was your patriotic duty and your rights as American citizens to voice dissent against our leaders if you felt they weren't doing the right thing? Remember?

 

What Rush said was just the tip of the iceberg. You better start hardening up a little bit because there's a lot more anti-Obama stuff coming your way! And I'm going to love every minute of it.

 

Billy Kess

http://billykess.com/

I just want to go over a few things regarding today's activities. First, I have to say that although I didn't vote for Obama (I would never vote for someone that liberal), I still felt a sense of pride and dignity as I watched the inauguration process today. For one, I was proud to hear that with all the masses of people who were in Washington DC today, not one disorderly conduct citation was issued. Not one. It was peaceful, it was orderly, it was the way it should be for this great American process. The rotation of leadership.

 

 

Now I can go on about how Bush was treated unfairly. How Bill Clinton, Nancy Pelosi, Ted Kennedy, Al Gore, John Kerry, and scores of other Democrats said during Clinton's administration that "Saddam and his WMD must be taken out" - and how Bush came along and instead of just talking the talk, he walked the walk - and the liberals hated him for it. Or about how his poll numbers went down only because he disappointed his conservative base by catering to the liberals - who thanked him by hating him more and giving him the bad approval ratings that they would have given him anyway. Or  how he liberated 50,000,000 from the tyranny of terrorist rule. How he protected us from another terror attack on U.S. soil since 9/11. I can turn this into a 'defend-Bush' article real quick if I wanted to. But I won't.

 

I can also gripe about this inauguration costing 150 million dollars. I can also bring up how the DOW dropped 332 points today while this $150,000,000 inauguration was taking place - and how little the mainstream media reported it. Or how the Dow  fell 14 percent between Barack Obama’s election and Inauguration Day, the biggest decline ever. But I won't.

 

Instead I will say that I was proud to be an American today and to see the enthusiasm on the faces of all those happy, smiling people. Again, Obama was not my choice, but I felt happy because I knew those people were happy. Which does bring me to my first point about one of the major differences between liberal Democrats and conservative Republicans.

 

During Bush's inauguration, not just his second one, but even his first one, there were dissenters there from the get-go - ready to jeer, hiss, and boo as he went by. And they did. Many of them yelling things like "You are not my President" and "Go back to Texas". But there was none of that kind of rhetoric towards President Obama today. Why? Is it because Obama has no dissenters? Is it because the entire nation thinks he's going to be a great leader? No. That's not why.

 

The fact is, and I will be so bold, that conservative Republicans have more respect for their country then liberal Democrats do. It's that conservatives, by and large, will at least have the decency and respect to hold back these kinds of protests during the day of the presidential inauguration. Yes, there will be plenty of Obama-bashing in the days, weeks, months, and years ahead. Of that I am most certain. But not today.

Today was a day to welcome our new President and at least give him the benefit of the doubt. A day to respect the man who was elected to lead our nation. A day to put love of country and respect for the process above personal opinion. A day to put differences aside - if only for today.

 

This, my friends, is why there was no boo'ing and hissing towards our new Commander in Chief. May God bless him and may God show him the way and be a profound factor in all of Mr. Obama's decisions. The sense of pride and dignity in our nation that I felt is something a liberal can never feel when it isn't his or her man standing there being sworn in. I think I can safely speak for most conservatives when I say that in spite of who it was being sworn in, we still felt that sense of pride and dignity and love for country - and these feelings come before our need to scream out in dissent. Respect for the process. Respect for America. Something that, sadly, the liberals just didn't seem to have on this day in 2005 and 2001. Something that, sadly, the liberals only seem to have when they get what they want. In this case, that was Obama.

 

But even yet. Scores from the crowd still managed to boo H.W. Bush, G.W. Bush, and Dick Cheney when they came out to speak. Even still. And worse yet - they not only boo'd these men, they even boo'd Laura Bush - the school teacher who happens to be the wife of George W. Bush and the former First Lady - as if she, too, did something wrong. Nice. Real nice people.

 

I do think that although most of us will have some serious discontent with Obama's ways and means as his administration wears on, some even bitter at times, we will still - for the most part, anyway - refrain from the downright intolerance and hate that the liberals showed our former President G.W. Bush.

 

Billy Kess

http://billykess.com/blog

 

If you are a parent of a young girl, ask yourself this... Would you want your daughter to be taken across state lines with a school official to get an abortion with you never even knowing she was pregnant? There's a law against it called "The Parental Notification Law" and Planned Parenthood wants to have that law abolished so that they can have your daughter get an abortion without you ever knowing about it. Still think Planned Parenthood is a good thing? They will pretend to be ignorant of a girl's age if she is too young - so that she can get an abortion. They will also cover up statutory rape so that she can get an abortion. (Abortions mean profit for Planned Parenthood - it's the business they are in).

They lie and say abortion is safe. It's not safe for the baby, that's for sure, but it's not safe for the woman, either. Thousands have died as a result of this procedure. And over 90% of those who haven't regret having an abortion. Many become depressed and suicidal. There is also a high rate of breast cancer among women who have had abortions.

LINKS:

http://www.abortionfacts.com/Statistics/abortion_and_death_statistics.asp

But Planned Parenthood is silent when it comes to all these studies. They blow them all off as "lies" by "prolife fanatics".

Which makes me wonder... fighting for the rights of unborn babies to be allowed to live is fanatical? But fighting for the right to be allowed to terminate them is not fanatical? Which side really is fanatical? The side that errs towards life or the side that screams abortion on demand? I'm tired of being called a "radical" or a "fanatic" or having the pro-abortion crowd painting all of us with the same brush as if we're all a bunch of clinic bombing terrorists for the cause.

Do these people look like clinic bombing fanatical terrorists to you?

 

However, I wouldn't want to run into these freak cases in a dark alley...

 

Anyway, Planned Parenthood not only hides all these things from their clients, but they are also fighting a law that states any woman who wants an abortion must first watch a video of their own baby inside the womb. What harm could that possibly do? Why is Planned Parenthood fighting tooth and nail against such a suggestion? Do we not want the woman to have all the information before making such a decision? Isn't a sonogram part of that collection of information?

Planned Parenthood is against such a practice for one reason and one reason only. It may change the woman's mind. She may decide not to have the abortion after all and that would cut into Planned Parenthood's profits. Worse yet, the woman may become a prolife advocate and speak out against the horrors of abortion and Planned Parenthood.

There was once a time in America where the KKK and slavery were considered part of everyday life. Now, we look back at that part of history with disgust and shame. And one day, we will look back on Planned Parenthood and see them as we see the KKK today. The only difference is the victims they are lynching are the unborn. Abortion for convenience will be viewed on the same level as slavery. An ugly piece of American history we're going to be extremely ashamed of.

 

Billy Kess

http://www.billykess.com/blog

 

Let's start with Hamas. Hamas is an organization formed over 20 years ago to be a Palestinian version of Egypt's "Muslim Brotherhood", which is a violent, radical Islamist group dedicated to world wide Muslim rule and who's influence is heavy in most of Palestine. The main goal of Hamas is not to live in peace and harmony with the Israelis, but to destroy them - wipe them off the face of the planet - any means necessary. And for the past 20 years, they have done nothing but attack Israel.

 

It is said that Hamas was the first to begin what has become almost a fad among Islamic Palestinians dedicated to the cause. This fad known as suicide bombing. While many of these attacks are targeted towards Israeli military forces, most of these gutless, Islamic, suicidal cowards do their deeds in places like shopping markets and school buses where the victims are mostly civilians consisting of women and children. Most do so with the belief that their god is going to be pleased with their murderous ending and grant them an eternity in paradise with 72 virgins at their beckon call.

 

Hamas is also a political party who's charter states  "There is no solution for the Palestinian question except through Jihad". No, that's not too radical, is it?  In 2006, they won a surprise victory beating Fatah in the Palestinian elections.

 

 

Do I feel sympathy for the Palestinians civilians being hurt and killed by Israel's missiles? Yes. Is it a whole lot of sympathy? No. It is limited because these civilians are also the people who voted for Hamas knowing they were not only a political party, but a group of terrorist Islamic radicals dedicated to wiping out Israel - even if means having a jihad. Not to mention it was also these "innocent civilians" who took to the streets in celebration - handing out candy and praising Osama bin Laden - when we were attacked on 9/11/01.

 

So much for their sympathy towards us Americans, right?

 

Israel keeps on doing whatever it can do to avoid conflict, but the Palestinians don't seem to want peace unless and until Israel ceases to exist completely. Most of this conflict is based upon land rather than religious ideologies. In 1967, during what is known as the "Six Day War", Israel gained access to The Gaza Strip (Egypt) and The West Bank (Jordan). Technically, this land is theirs. They won it fair and square in a war that they didn't start.

 

If Canada ever started a war with the USA. (They would have to be smoking some seriously intense cannabis if they did), but let's say they did and we fought back and pushed into one of their provinces while doing so. When the war ends, that would be our land now. If Canada didn't want to lose it, they shouldn't have started a war with us in the first place.

 

In 1993, then Israeli Prime Minister Rabin and then Palestinian Leader Yasser Arafat (the godfather of airplane hijacking) signed an agreement known as the Oslo Accord where as Israel promised to pull out of The Gaza Strip and West Bank only leaving behind only small settlements and military installations. After having a little oral sex with a Washington D.C. intern, then-President Billy-boy Clinton invited terrorist Yasser Arafat along with the Israeli Prime Minister to the White House for a ceremony where Rabin and Arafat would shake hands for the first time - as seen in this photo that was flickered around the world.

 

 

Of course, to the anti-semetic Palestians, that still wasn't enough.

 

Fast forward several years of bloodshed later, in August of 2005, against the protests of Israeli settlers, Israeli's then-Prime Minster Ariel Sharon demanded all Israelis pull out of the Gaza Strip stating that it was not worth the endurance of so much violence that was caused by them being there. In other words he folded like a cheap lawn chair to the dirtbag terrorist bullies of Hamas and company.

 

The Jew haters still remained unsatisfied. The attacks on Israel continue. Over the years it's just been the same old story. Israel makes peace and truce with the Palestinians - only to have them eventually break that truce with another attack against Israel.

 

The latest wave of attacks came during Christmas Eve and Christmas Day. On Christmas Day, Israel warned the Palestinians of Gaza that their attacks on Israel's southern towns will be met with a response. They dropped leaflets over The Gaza Strip with stern warnings. These anti-semites out there who claim Israel is the terrorist - I ask them... did those Islamic hijackers drop leaflets down on NYC telling us that they were going to be flying planes into the Twin Towers? All Hamas had to do was stop the attacks. And they refused. And so, Israel strikes back. And with justification.

 

The killing of civilians is a sad fact of war. There is no such thing as a perfect war. Civilians will die. But one of the tactics that radical Islam seems to use is they purposely place their military - troops, weapons, rocket launching pads, etc - amongst heavily populated civilian areas. Then, when these strategically placed areas are bombed, and civilians die, the bombers are accused of terrorism.

 

Israel is not targeting these civilians the way the Palestinians are targeting Israeli civilians. The Palestinians make it all too obvious with the school buses and market places.

 

To anyone who is just informing themselves on world wide events - do not buy into the garbage that the anti-semites feed people. Israel is not the aggressors nor are they the terrorists. Israel has been fighting for their right to exist. They have made sacrifice after sacrifice only to find that the Jew hating Arab world still hates them just as much as ever.

 

And also, Israel has the might and the man-power to kill every Palestinian man, woman, and child in The Gaza Strip and the West Bank if they so wanted to. But you don't see that happening. On the other hand, do you think Israel would still exist if the Palestinians had the weapons instead of Israel?

 

Bottom line is this... Israel will defend themselves. And if God forbid this socialist Barack Hussein Obama cuts off American support for them, this country of ours will no longer be blessed.

 

Billy Kess

Why are so many atheists going around demanding we put any reference to Jesus or God out of sight this Christmas season? Why would anyone be offended by something they don't believe in in the first place? Truthfully, I think it goes beyond a simple case of the non-beliefs. I think it has more to do with hate and intolerance than anything else.

One of the hateful and intolerant groups known as the Freedom From Religion Foundation (FFRF) has launched an all-out war against Christmas this year. One reference to this on their website reads "FFRF vs. Christian Crybabies".

Not for nothing, but the only crybabies I am seeing are the ones who are pissing and moaning about a manger being displayed at the local Townhall and that's just pathetic. Why can't these religion-hating ghouls just grow up and deal with it?

And please don't give me that Separation of Church and State garbage. The anti-Christian, non-religious left hijacked  its meaning and twisted it to fit their own agenda.

Separation of church and state simply means that the Government can not tell us who we can or can not worship and how we will go about that worship. It doesn't mean we're not to post the 10 Commandments in a court yard. It does not mean Bibles and prayers and "I love Jesus" t-shirts need to be banned from public schools.

It was meant to ensure that America would not become like England was back in those days. Where as a British citizen, you had to worship at, and donate to, one church and one church only. The Church of England. If you failed to do so, you were beheaded.

I say to the atheists of America: You don't believe in God? Fine. That doesn't bother me. That doesn't anger me. If anything, I feel pity for you. To go through life without having God in it must be tormenting. Maybe that's why you're so full of hate and intolerance. You don't have God in your lives.

I still don't get it, though. I mean, I don't believe in little green men on the planet Mars, yet, if a bunch of sci-fi freaks decided to set aside a day to honor these non-existant beings and decided to put fake little martians up all around the town, it wouldn't bother me one bit.

So why does our Nativity scenes bother you so much?

Billy Kess

http://www.billykess.com/